Ah em … it seems that my friend Andy Rowell, in a CT article, has taken on a subject all too often swept under the rug. The title of Rowell’s article (HT Nathan Smith) is “Jim Belcher, Francis Chan, N.T. Wright, and Others Leave the Pastorate to Write and Speak.” Now I like all of these guys. I have nothing to say against them personally. Indeed, there are times when pastors (seminary professors) are carrying on ministry that surpasses the confines of the local church. My general disposition is nonetheless, to see this as a bad move.
I am frustrated by the way leadership through publishing takes one out of the local church by which our very theology and practice should be formed. I believe the theology of the future, the shape of the church to come, is better led through people engaging real life in the church and writing from it. If one’s theology does not sustain oneself in the church, why should I trust it in my own ministry/life in the church?
This goes for seminary professors, speakers at conferences, books that have pervasive influence in the church but seem to be sadly lacking in the practical in-life-concreteness that drives the questions and production of theology that should change the church. I think we should ask publishers, why should we listen to people who are detached from life in the church leadership? Again, I am sure there are occasions where this makes sense, but we should ask nonetheless.
I have thought this through a couple of times. I’ve thought about the advantages of going on the speaker tour, writing more popular books, leave the church and relax in a cabin somewhere and pump out no less than one book a year. But to me, and this is just me, it doesn’t work.
Here’s Three Reasons Why I Can’t Leave Ministry En Toto To Publish More Books
1.) There’s this weird thing that happens to you when you stand up in front of people as the expert on church (whether its missional church, missional theology or whatever). You become detached from real life, you start to take on a persona, and start telling people what you think they need to do. This to me is a waste of time. It’s a flimsy moment that vanishes with little fruit. Many just turn off, and I find it’s impact is minimal. And yet I cannot avoid this disposition any other way than by staying grounded in a community, being humbled again and again, allowing my life and ministry to be in submission to a real life Body of Christ, being grounded in the day to day mess that is church. It enables me to go speak as one among, listening and inviting a conversation, and providing some signposts for new directions out of my numerous experience and theological work. .
2.) My theology and writing is improved so much by my being involved in real life church with other pastors working out the issues we confront in the vast new frontiers of church and mission. My writing would become purely theoretical if I wasn’t grounded in church life. Sure I can engage with multiple stories that I hear etc… but nothing shapes the theology I write like real life issues in the church.
3.) The proof or test of what you’re writing is in the actual outworking of it in the church. If it can’t sustain you in ministry why should anyone think it can sustain them in theirs? Enough said.
It is a symbol of the sick American church culture that we make experts of people who write books. I do not wish to disaparage everyone who has left church to write books. There are alot of them who do it for a season and it makes sense. There are alot of them who stay involved in church and its leadership in other ways than being a pastor. And for full disclosure sake, I have 2 books coming out later this year and next, and I am a part-time pastor (not full time) and full time professor and I try to spend time in the neighborhoods (which for me is McD’s, hockey rinks, friends down the street).
Here’s hoping for a theology and missiology that receives its life from God’s work in the local church. Peace to all those who disagree with me …
What about you? Do you trust an author on the church who has left his/her church to write books and speak?
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.