As Christians in N. America, we face stark new challenges related to our inherited ways of being church. I’m talking about the cultural challenges to truth, poor perception of Christians in the public, pluralism, a loss of sanctification/discipleship practice in the face of consumerism, alternative sexualities, and our participation in bringing justice to the world (to name just a few). As we seek to respond to these challenges for Mission, it seems we are locked in between two options: conservative or progressive, stretched out on a continuum.
On the one hand, there are those who want to return to older Reformation articulations of the faith while re-applying these understandings to engaging Mission. On the other hand, there are those who seek relevance by updating their faith along with their practice to the cultural issues we face. Many people think the reasonable thing to do when faced with these polarities is to be moderate. “Let’s find some common ground. Let’s meet in the middle,” they say. Moderation, a middle way, a third way.
But the moderate approach ignores the fact that both these ways only appeal to the already convinced. Only people already committed to Christian life (in some way) will find a “return” or a more “relevant” Christianity appealing. There is no crossing boundaries to those who have no foundation to understand the past Reformed formulations or already possess a more culturally relevant (and more immediately accessible) way to pursue life, love and justice that does not need Christ.
The way forward is therefore not moderation between these two options. No, we must turn towards a more immoderate way.
As God came in Christ entering our world, inhabiting, being “with” us, to bring salvation into the world, so too must we follow Him, boldly, recklessly, crossing all boundaries into our world. As God was prodigal, excessive, even reckless, becoming present in time, place, and context, we too must join Him in becoming “prodigal” in our love for the world. We must be present in His presence for the world. Only a “prodigal” gospel can break free of our Christendom continuum.
Of course, how do we do this is the big question. There are growing numbers of people within the Anabaptist, Holiness, Charismatic, classic Reformed and centrist Baptist church movements who have never really fit nicely into the liberal/fundamentalist debates or the more recent conservative/progressive continuum. They are growing in number exploring this immoderate approach, breaking out of the Christendom bind, drawing from the resources of the radical Reformation and beyond. This group seeks an immoderate radical holy faithfulness for the future witness of the church in these times. Are you one of these people? Do you find yourself in a “holy discontent” with the present options?
If you see yourself and your tribe within this Immoderate Proposal, here are some steps continue this movement:
- Gather: Many are gathering (virtually and physically) around the immoderate Mission of God, and Missio Alliance is a central space for this. Please join their Newsletter or Facebook page.
- Spread: Share this post and others like it far and wide, telling people there is more than moderation for God people in the world.
- Read: Today is the release of our book outlining 10 signposts leading us into God’s mission called Prodigal Christianity (digital and hardback). It comes out of our experiences of seeking the mission of God beyond the Christendom continuum between conservative and progressive. Please read it, review it, and share it.
And many many blessings to all as we gather to seek a new faithfulness for Mission in our time.
(This post was co-authored by Dave Fitch and Geoff Holsclaw)
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.