As I’ve been hanging out with missional communities I regularly find the same issues popping up as hurdles to their progress in community formation and witness in the neighborhoods. Much of these issues are overreaction to “non-missional” Christendom forms of church. I call these items “things that get lost in translation.” Here’s 5 things that (in my humble opinion) get lost in translation when we go from Christendom modern forms of church to post Christendom missional forms of church.
1.) The Ability to Lead: It is a principle of mission that leadership shall be non-hierarchical. Instead it shall be leadership in mutual submission to one another. This kind of leadership is based in the 5 fold gifting (Eph 4:11 APEST), and by definition decentralizes leadership. It spreads leadership out into the neighborhoods. But over and over again I see people interpreting this to mean “no leadership.” This is a case of leadership getting lost in the translation.
The leaders shall lead. In other words, the ones recognized for being gifted in teaching, evangelism, pastoral care, apostleship and prophetic work shall all lead in these areas, and foster more leaders in these and other areas in the neighborhoods. But they shall lead non-hierarchically in the pattern of mutual submission. Leadership will therefore sound like this: “I’ve listened and heard you all say _______ , I‘ve prayed about _________ , I’ve learned from Scripture _________ , and I believe therefore God is calling us to do __________, and so I submit __________ to you. Where am I off? where am I on? The leader then leads a discussion which refines _____________ or maybe completely changes it. A good leader leads the group to a group resolution where everyone can follow the well-led discernment.
2.) Proclamation of the Gospel: We live in a world where the Bible and the church have lost its cultural authority. Many churches still resort to reason as the currency of faith. Apologetics!! Let’s “win” people to Christ … literally! Missional communities often react to that by saying we need embodied witness in the new post Christendom culture. This demands we embody the truth in our lives. This is how the world shall see and know, become curious and seek what we have in the gospel. The Holy Spirit is at work in the world, we need only co’operate. But often times this has led us to be shy about proclaiming the gospel. We think it is coercive or abusive to proclaim the gospel to believers/non believers alike. I think this is another case of being lost in translation.
Proclamation is an epistemological shift beyond modernity’s rationality. We proclaim something out of ownership, our own history. We do not seek to prove, convince. It is something we do into contextual real life situations. Among ourselves proclamation of gospel might sound like “we proclaim Jesus is Lord over …” “we declare … “ Among non-believers, when the door opens to proclaim gospel it might sound like “in relation to your situation I believe ….. “ “I am convinced …“ Proclamation is always followed by an invitation. Can you receive that? Does that make sense ? Can you open your life to that possibility?
Proclamation recognizes truth is a matter of narrative. And often the world is living a completely different narrative than the gospel. Yet because it is based in ‘Our Story,’ proclamation is never coercive. There is an epistemological humility among missional communities as we enter into the world. Yet we should not be hesitant to proclaim gospel out of our own lives and our history in Christ (the Scriptures). That is what God uses. Proclamation speaks truth in love allowing the Holy Spirit to convince.
The Next Post I want to discuss 3 more overreactions.
3.) Gathering. The reaction against attractional forms of church often leaves us without the wherewithal to gather a social group big enough to be a presence in the neighborhood. We also worry a lot about our worship being too attractional and so we unintentionally put up barriers for new people to enter.
4.) Engaging Community The tension between being present with the poor versus making the poor “a project” often leaves us paralyzed in terms of engaging the community.
5.) Sentness is Bad In reaction to “colonialism” we worry than any re-location smacks of presumption and an exercise of uni-directional power. As a result, church-planting efforts sometimes gets stunted.
In the meantime … how does your church handle these issues? What oither issues get lost in translation in your ministry work in the local church?
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.