The visual image of an empty church, especially a majestic church, a European Cathedral, tells the compelling story many of us find ourselves in in N America. J R Rozko, who redid my blog here a couple weeks ago (thanks a million JR!!) used the picture of an empty church in Toronto as the new header. I don’t know the name of the church. But it is a symbol of what has become commonplace in both Canada and the northern United States. The exceptions are the mega church facilities, which are becoming few and far between in Canada (except for maybe Alberta) and are, I would argue, only a few generations from the same fate in the United States (at least the north that is). I could go on here about mega churches and their role in bringing about this state of affairs, but I leave that for yet another post.
These are the images of our time. In the YouTube video below, Father Robert Barron comments on the empty churches in Europe (HT here). He delivers a compelling challenge at the end. I thought I’d put it here in thanks to Rozko for his hard work on my blog, and the haunting reminder of the new situation we are in that now heads this blog. Thanks also to Nathan Colquhoun (and his storyboard solutions) for all his help on this blog over the years. What do you think about Barron’s theories about European culture, history and the empty churches? How far away are we from following the same history in N America? (I’m away in Canada for some R&R so my interactions may be sparse).
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.