Each year 3 million books are published while 550,000 people finish a marathon. Maybe this is why I admire people who finish a marathon more than people who write a book. As I said on FB this morning, you could probably write a book with a 1/4 of the discipline it takes to run a marathon. That discipline towards writing is becoming more common. Yet it is a peculiar discipline. In the age of A.D.D. it takes presence before the key board to write clearly, concisely and contribute within an arena of ideas.
You need discipline but you also need a sense of confidence that your ideas mean something. That confidence comes from testing your ideas in submission to a real community. (much better than a virtual community if you ask me). Most academic writers gain their confidence within the academy. But I believe, writing birthed within the depths of church life is more powerful, impactful and in the end theologically rich. These days finding a church community to journey with is more difficult. Nonetheless, it is so important to life, thinking, being grounded, and yes, good theological writing.
Some writers start well, writing vibrantly within a community. And then they migrate to writing for a living or becoming a professional conference speaker. They sometimes lose their connection with a vibrant community. Much like the pastor whose sermons lose their connection to any people struggling with Christian existence, their writing is dulled over time. In the same way academic writers, writing within and only for the academy, become “academic” (to be redundant). Their writing is of interest now only to specialists and their wider impact wanes.
So to my many good friends who think writing a book will change your life, I urge you to slow down a bit and think about running a marathon. Gain some discipline. Then, out of your everyday life, test your ideas in the midst of a real community. Then out of your experience and wealth of dialogues, write this book as an act of integration that comes from your life. Let go of what happens with it. You know, send it to some publishers, etc etc, but let your daily life in mission drive your life. Let what happens with the book be inconsequential to your life. And for sure you can manufacture a platform. But I would advise you let that platform happen organically, out of what you do in your everyday life.
Have I done this? Not always. Nonetheless, this is what I aspire to. Blessings to everybody who does NOT desire to write the next big book unless it comes out of their everyday lives, God forces it out of them, and it comes as a great surprise.
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.