The popular Showtime series Dexter has recently kicked off its eighth – and final – season. Fans of the show know that the tension is at an all-time high as Dexter Morgan and his sister Debra find themselves embroiled in a mess of violence and deception. Things are spiraling out of control, and it’s going to get very interesting.
Just before the seventh season aired I released my first book, about this very show, called Nothing but the Blood: The Gospel According to Dexter. One of the most common responses I get when people hear about my book is, “Dexter? Jesus? WHAT?” And I totally understand. How can a character whose hands are soaked in blood tell us anything about the Prince of Peace? How can a vigilante serial killer be compared to a gospel that is fundamentally about resurrection and new life? How does a man with an addiction to violence in any way speak to a rescued life in the kingdom of God?
Theologian Stanley Hauerwas has famously said, “I’m a pacifist because I’m a violent son of a b**ch.” And while that is an admittedly snarky quote and not the stuff of academic theology, it is actually quite profound. What Hauerwas is saying here is that fallen human beings are a contradiction. And as long as followers of Jesus are making our way through this broken world, we are perpetually unlearning our violence in order to give witness to, and embody, a kingdom of peace.
Dexter’s story is a bloody mingling of brokenness and restoration, of destructive violence and restorative justice. It is complex, like us. Like humanity in general. Like the Church.
Perhaps the most definitive scene in the series occurs when a young Dexter, already addicted to killing, talks to his sympathetic father in the car. His dad is a cop and recently lost his partner in a shootout. Dexter asks, “So what then – the world keeps spinning out of control?” His father responds:
No. The world can always be set right again.
As a missional movement our calling is to hope in the restorative justice of God – setting the world right again – even as we witness to it by engaging the world in acts of love, peace, and healing. And yet, our calling is also to be honest about our own contradictions, so that we are always postured toward the world around us in humility, not arrogance or self-righteousness. The gospel, really, is embodied in the complexity of a broken-yet-beautiful people who are experiencing ultimate hope and healing in the life, death, resurrection, and reign of Jesus.
And it is a welcoming word to a world spinning out of control.
Oh, one last thing. A sent, missional people engages the culture around them. They don’t run and hide, or get into entrenched, antagonistic positions. You might say, they listen to the “gospel” that is already echoing throughout the culture in which they find themselves. And they learn its story.
Even if it’s the story of a broken man like Dexter Morgan.
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.