I wonder how a Diaspora imagination or analogy might impact our understanding of the church on mission in our neighbourhoods today.
As we find ourselves in a new missional era as Christians in North America, we are the ‘other’, the ‘exile’, ‘the foreigner’. Though not necessarily scattered, we are increasingly vulnerable and on ‘unfamiliar’ cultural terrain in a post-Christendom society. Just like Jeremiah’s exiles and other Diaspora communities, we must figure out how to live life with and among in this ‘strange new world’ while maintaining continuity with our faith and traditions. We too are betwixt and between, displaced in fact from our previous mainstream, authoritative place in society, and the way to move forward like the Babylonian exiles and the Luke 10 sent ones, as a Diaspora people in a new missional era is to learn to live among, in, with, our neighbours as neighbours.
This sounds profoundly counter-intuitive. For too many people neighbourhoods are convenient containers where they park their cars and shut off the lights before embarking on another day out beyond the local. Some scorn this focus on neighbourhood. It sounds so ‘old fashioned‘(a favourite ad hominem of those who want to make an argument but have little basis for it). Others point to the brave new world of the Internet and the emergence of the non-locale. The new social media has, indeed, changed how we communicate but this can never replace the local. Some argue we now live in a world of non-local, affinity relationships so neighbourhood is an outmoded idea that misses all the new ways people are relating to one another. [However], affinity means homogeneity, it’s about finding people like me. But, what Paul was framing in the first half of Ephesians, is that affinity is precisely what the Cross and Resurrection came to overcome. An Incarnate God who, in the language of John’s Gospel came to pitch his tent right beside ours is One whom we meet in those ordinary, pedestrian places called neighbourhoods. For too long we’ve lost sight of how we came to this situation where neighbourhood ceased to be the primary place where our lives became embedded. In terms of the Christian narratives: sans embeddedness, sans Gospel. [Roxburgh goes on to assert that] it is in this boundary-breaking work of the Spirit where we encounter God. The location of this encounter is, literally, across the fence, across the street, in our neighbourhoods.
In what is known as the ‘Great Commission’, Jesus instructs His followers to, in their going, make disciples teaching them to obey everything He commanded. What did the Lord command? – First and foremost, that we love God AND our neighbour as ourselves. The primacy and clarity of these words leave little room for an optional or half-hearted response. Yet, in many church and mission contexts, we hardly take it seriously, let alone literally. I would like to suggest, based on a number of theological and sociological arguments (which we don’t have room to explore here), that taking neighbourhood seriously acknowledges God’s people in North America as sent and vulnerable ones (Luke 10) who are called and empowered by the Spirit to live out this identity as neighbours. As neighbours, they can engage in incarnational, contextual postures and practices such that they bear witness to the good news that God is in the business of redeeming all things!
And redemption is about renewal, something to celebrate this Chinese New Year’s weekend!
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.