Bill and Imbi Kinnon are tireless is producing interviews and video materials promoting the missional cause. They do great work. Here they make me look good and of course being with Gary Nelson doesn’t hurt. In this video they catch Gary – pres. of Tyndale University College Toronto and important Canadian Missional author/thinker – and I chatting about the future of “missional” as a viable conversation for the future of the church. Gary engages what’s really important above all the posturing that comes with the word “missional.” It is interesting that I mention four ideas as the defining building bocks for a missional conversation: 1.) Post Christendom as the defining cultural position of the church in the West, 2.) Missio Dei, 3.) the Incarnational Logic of the church, and 4.) the idea of Witness as the primary mode of communicating the gospel in our post Christendom Context. I am about to blog about these four ideas as I have been rethinking them and the issues at stake. I must have been thinking about them back in August when we taped these interviews. Thanks to Imbi and Bill for taping these (there’s two more to come) and Gary for sitting down and chatting. I really enjoyed our time.
Nelson/Fitch – Missional – Does the word still have value? from Bill Kinnon on Vimeo.
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.