As we all learned recently, Dr. Jerry Falwell Jr. is packing!
Liberty University has provided clean video of President Falwell's comments at convocation this morning. Falwell says he meant to refer to "terrorists" not all Muslims. We will have reaction from President Falwell tonight on 13 News at 11.
Posted by ABC 13 News- WSET Official Page on Friday, December 4, 2015
“Good violence beats bad violence. Neutralizing the threat. Taking them out. Let’s all get trained to defend and, when necessary, kill. Praise God, Amen. Et cetera.” We’ve heard this before.
For some Christians, this entire event feels grotesque. Although we might not be surprised, we are still shocked by the warped, disfigured image of the Gospel it projects.
When confronted with an event like this, I tend to scramble about internally – looking for reasons to assure myself that I am somehow not covered by the shadow it casts. Falwell becomes an easy target I use to confirm for myself and those who already agree with me how right I am.
I want to assert distance and difference: I am not like him. Or more corporately: We are not like them. I want to leverage the *obvious* ridiculousness of it all to clarify my position over against those who are wrong.
Then I watched the video again, and the second wave of shock reverberated deep in my gut. If I listen closely and really pay attention, I can hear my own voice in his.
To my great horror, it turns out that I’m packing too. I’m more like Falwell than I like to admit. It turns out I’m packing too. I’m more like Falwell than I like to admit. Click To Tweet
The grotesque display helps clarify my brokenness. It leads me to the darker places in my heart I conveniently leave unexplored. It becomes an occasion for noticing the subtle-but-thick grace I’ve overlooked in my self-justification.
So, I repent. I repent because I, too, keep weapons concealed in my back pocket. I pull them out whenever I feel like my status quo is threatened. I repent because I, too, stand in places of power and make religious declarations that cost me nothing yet bolster my image among my constituents.
I repent because I’ve actually discharged my weapon – lashed out in violence – against those who tread on my comfort and unholy pursuit for religious accomplishment. I repent because I’ve committed these acts under the guise of non-violence. I repent because I have defended my turf in my power over and over again.
I repent because I have trusted in the power of the weapons I have concealed more than I have trusted Christ, more than I have trusted in the Spirit’s power to raise the dead. I repent of my desire for control and safety.
Today, I want to come out in the open and name that I am afraid of losing control and becoming totally dependent. Today, I want to surrender my fear and fear tactics to Christ’s peace. Today, I want to trust with my whole self that the Lamb who was slain has begun his reign.
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.