I have long resisted the recognition of certain national holidays in the church. National holidays such as Washington’s Birthday, July 4th Independence Day, Veteran’s Days/Memorial Days when they extol allegiance to the nation-state and its wars as opposed to the allegiance to Christ as Lord (This does not mean that we should not support the healing and restoration of our troops who have been through such horrific circumstances in many cases). “Heck,” I’ve even warned against recognizing “Father’s Day” and “Mother’s Day” because too often they have allowed the idolization of the family above Jesus Christ as Lord over the family within the people of God. I fear Father’s and Mother’s days have been occasions for the promotion of economic activity as opposed to Jesus as Lord over the family. I have resisted the temptation for protestant evangelicals to form our calendar around the agenda of our nation-state (in USA). I have been protective towards the forming of our corporate life around the sense of time and calendar and the progress of days we Christians have always recognized as holy days: advent, Christmas, Epiphany, Lent, Good Friday, Easter, post Easter days (ascension), Pentecost. I have come to deeply appreciate that we are formed by all of these special days we recognize as holy days.
But there is something unique about Martin Luther King Day. For here is a “saint” of the church (yes I think we can say he was a saint despite some problematic faults) not necessarily a figure of the nation-state. I think I can safely argue that King worked for a justice born out of the history we have been given in the nation of Israel, Christ, the cross and the resurrection. Therefore, remembering Martin Luther King rehearses for all of us the impact of the church in the world for a justice that comes from the cross. My own personal belief is that the secularization of King’s work, in some cases by his own comrades, diminished the civil rights movement. For me this is all the more reason for the church to claim him as our own! I certainly realize this is up for debate. But even if I am wrong about the specific history of it all in its details, I am convinced the church, especially the evangelical church, would be well served in its mission and witness for Christ, to reclaim Martin Luther King for the church of Jesus Christ from those who wish to purely define his work as an advancement of a secular politic,
Yesterday, in church, before the passing of the peace, I read a few updates on various Christian justice efforts our church was either participating in or seeking participation in. Then Michelle Lewis, an African-American member of our congregation came to the front, explained the significance of Martin Luther King for the Christian church and then prayed that Life on the Vine church would become a place for the furthering of Christ’s justice. Way to go Michelle! We then invited our congregation to share “the peace of Christ” with each other. Rarely has “the peace” meant so much.
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.