Advent is definitely not for sissies.
So writes Fleming Rutledge, the Episcopal priest, author, and theologian who penned Christianity Today’s 2017 Book of the Year, The Crucifixion: Understanding the Death of Jesus Christ. In her latest work, Advent: The Once & Future Coming of Jesus Christ, she compiles a brilliant and engaging collection of Advent sermons ranging from 1975 to the present.
Reverend Rutledge begins with an introduction to Advent that every pastor will want to read as they prepare to lead their church through the commencement of the Christian year. The first part of the book contains a handful of Advent-related writings before moving on to “Pre-Advent” sermons on themes like the final judgment, the justice of God, and sermons for the Feast of Saint Michael and Christ the King. Ultimately it isn’t until page 251 that her formal Advent sermons begin.
Rutledge’s primary contention is that the church has too often used Advent to prepare for Christmas and all the ornamental sentimentalism (what she refers to as “Christmas creep”) that comes with it, rather than to seriously prepare for the second coming of Jesus and His final judgment.
The eschatological note of Advent, focusing on the second coming of Christ—the principal subject of this book—has been largely ignored even among the most enthusiastic Advent-lovers of late (pg. 4).
“Advent Begins in the Dark.”
As a pastor, I confess I have too often led our church through the season of Advent doing the very thing she cautions against—attempting to suspend belief that the incarnation has happened so that we can prepare for Christmas anew. It may be a surprise to readers that the original Advent themes were not hope, peace, joy, and love.
…the Medieval church designed the four Sundays of Advent around the themes of the four last things: death, judgment, heaven, and hell—in that order, so that the subject of hell was preached on the Sunday just before Christmas Eve. That was no accident. The idea was—and is—to show how the light of the birth of Christ appeared against a backdrop of darkness, depravity, and despair (pg. 238).
In Florida recently a disturbing and stomach-turning plot was uncovered at Bartow Middle School where an 11 and 12-year-old student planned to hide in the bathroom, overpower smaller students, cut them up, and eat them before turning a knife on themselves, all in the service of Satan.
This, the Reverend Fleming Rutledge would contend, is an Advent story. Or, in her own words, “Advent begins in the dark.”
But that story is not quite as palatable to the contemporary church-going consumer. This in turn leads to churches forsaking these demanding themes of judgment and death in lieu of multiple “Christmas Eve” services that often begin two weeks before Christmas!
But as Reverend Rutledge insists, Advent isn’t a time to prepare for Christmas. Rather, its purpose is to “take an unflinching inventory of darkness” (pg. 173). Rutledge accomplishes this by recounting stories from recent headlines that highlight the darkness displayed in human depravity. Against this “backdrop of darkness” the light of Christ gleams even brighter as she proclaims the hope of God’s judgment on evil and the good news of Christ’s reign in the second coming.
I appreciate Rutledge’s repeated emphasis on the fact that there are not only two powers working in the world (humans and God), but three powers. Rutledge acknowledges her own tradition has largely made obsolete the embarrassing pre-enlightenment belief in a literal second coming and the “antiquated” notion of divine judgment. Rutledge is clearly not capitulating to mainline denominational norms as she proclaims the reality of an enemy force that is active, not just in our world, but in each of us.
The Wait is Worth It
The only drawback to this collection is that the writing style can be quite repetitive. She acknowledges that this is a possibility in the beginning of the book, however this does not relieve the redundancy of some of the sermons. In one way, this repetition can serve to reinforce the major themes of Advent as she sees them, but it can also become slightly monotonous as if reading the same sermon with slightly different illustrations. Perseverance pays off however as the final chapters reward the reader with three sermons that may be considered the highlight of the collection.
A major concern for Rutledge is not just that we understand the proper themes of Advent, but that we as the church would begin to live as Advent people.
The call is for the Church to reclaim for the sake of its own life and mission Advent’s focus on the reign of God and, in so doing, to hone once again the counter-cultural edge of the Gospel at the very beginning of the liturgical year (pg. 5).
If you can’t imagine the world you are heading toward, you can’t work toward contributing toward that world. Advent helps us to anticipate the kind of world that will be realized when Christ comes again to judge evil and renew all things.If you can’t imagine the world you are heading toward, you can’t work toward contributing toward that world. Advent helps us to anticipate the kind of world that will be realized when Christ comes again to judge evil and renew all… Click To Tweet
In our present lives we are both bearing witness to and waiting expectantly for the coming of the Lord. Bearing witness is an active stance; waiting is a passive stance. Both are part of the message of the herald of the age to come (pg. 12).
And so, locating ourselves as living between the Old age and the New age to come makes all the difference in the way the church conducts itself in the present.
But ultimately Advent tells us that:
The church is not called to be a “change agent”—God is the agent of change. The Lord of the kosmos has already wrought the Great Exchange in his cross and resurrection, and the life of the people of God is sustained by that mighty enterprise. The calling of the church is to place itself where God is already at work. The church lives, therefore, without fear, in faith that the cosmic change of regime has already been accomplished (pg. 12-13).
Recently, if you follow Fleming Rutledge on Twitter (@flemingrut), you would have read her response to a conversation on the labels “progressive” and “conservative.” She tweets,
Since I don't really believe in human "progress," I particularly dislike "progressive." Besides, "progress" toward what? Advent tells us that it is the Lord who "progresses" to us (Advent), not the other way around.
— Fleming Rutledge (@flemingrut) November 3, 2018
This is a good summary of Rutledge’s emphasis of God as the primary actor through all of human history and her realistic assessment of the weakness of humanity when unaided by the grace of God.
The Church on Mission During Advent
What this all means for the church on mission is that as we live in between the ages, or “on the frontier of the turn of the ages” (pg. 13). We are marked by fearless living, radical forgiveness, and the weapon of nonviolence. We recognize and regularly remember that there is a hostile enemy force that is engaged in seeking to thwart God’s mission as we resist evil and give witness to the coming reign of God in our service, prayer, and counter-cultural lives together.
But ultimately, our hope lies not in our own personal or communal efforts, initiatives, and agendas, but rather the God of Advent who drew near to us in Jesus and who will come again to take away the darkness forever and be our eternal light.Ultimately, our hope lies not in our own personal or communal efforts, initiatives, and agendas but rather the God of Advent who drew near to us in Jesus and will come again to take away the darkness forever and be our eternal light. Click To Tweet
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.