I have always had my feet in both evangelicalism and the emerging church/missional church conversations. From the beginning I have resonated with the questions emerging church thinkers were asking and the missiologies/ecclesiologies the missional thinkers were advocating. And yet I have also tried to maintain my relationships and my ecclesiastical accountability within evangelicalism, not only my own denomination but also evangelicalism as a whole. I believe I was born here and I should not go out and try to choose (in some sort of consumerist way) a denomination that suits my tastes. I was born into this tradition (I think we can call evangelicalism and certain denominations a tradition) and I should work for renewal and transformation within it. This is why the upcoming topic at Up/rooted North on September 20 is an important one for me – â€œQuestioning the Answers: the emerging church critique of evangelicalism.â€ I look forward to being with Scot McKnight, who most of the emerging church crowd already is very familiar with as well as Wayne Johnson from Trinity Evangelicals Divinity School in Deerfield. Wayne is astute and open to understanding the emerging church and postmodernity. We’ll be asking what is the most profound and substantive critique the emerging church offers evangelicalism, and what contribution in terms of doctrine and/or practice has the emerging church made for the benefit of the evangelical church. This should be a good time. There will be lots of conversation. Will Prof Don Carson show up?
Below is the announcement posted at the up/rooted blog. Sorry about my ridiculous mugshot but I blame this amateur photographer whose name will go unmentioned over at the seminary where I teach.
Up/rooted-ers, have we got an evening for you: not just one thinker on the emerging church, but three! Up/rooted.north will be hosting a panel discussion called â€œQuestioning the Answers: the emerging church critique of evangelicalismâ€ on Thursday, Sept. 20th at 7pm at Life on the Vine in Long Grove, IL.
Youâ€™re invited to this open and provocative panel discussion of the emerging churchâ€™s critiques of evangelicalism, and thoughtful consideration of the way forward. Our panel will consist of:
Scot McKnight, professor at North Park University and prodigious blogger and author;
Wayne Johnson, professor and director of the MDiv program at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School;
Dave Fitch, professor at Northern Baptist Seminary, pastor at Life on the Vine, and slightly less prodigious blogger and author.
Each panelist will respond to a particular emerging church critique of evangelicalism (think issues of authority, church structure, worship, preaching, role of Scripture, etc.) and weâ€™ll get a chance to engage with them in open discussion of these crucial issues.
Come and engage these thinkers, teachers, and pastors and each other as we gather together around the emerging conversation. Hope to see you there!
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.