I got back today from the evolving church conference in Oakville (Greater Toronto) Ontario today. Is there something happening in Canada or what? 700 people showed up for the Saturday. I came away deeply impressed by the commitment and character of the younger generations (20’s-30’s) and all the rest of us there too. I came away incredibly encouraged. Thanks to Nathan, Darryl, Chris, Steve for having me be part of it.
My quick take on the conference.
Ron Sider delivered another one of his standard excellent overviews of the stunning inequities between the rich developed world and the poverty stricken underdeveloped worlds. Ron always makes you think. He also describes how the Scriptures, with no compromise, call us to participate in ministering to this situation. Ron has some proposals that are always good. My push for Sider? Resist any bifurcation of personal salvation from social righteousness. Instead of saying that we must have both, talk of how there is no justification without participation in the justice-ification. Nevertheless, he was the first prophet of “holistic salvation. Also, let us resist quantifying justice in the terms of the system that causes injustice: capitalism, lest we foist its ills on the poor and make them poorer still.
Jim Wallis talked about the themes he has become famous for. How Christians should be pro-life both in regard to resisting abortion and the Iraq war. How Christians should neither be Republican or Democrat (he tried to translate these issues into Canadian terms). But he added how there will be no social justice without people of faith. And how poverty will not change until we have community with the poor and are touched by/in relationship to the poor. I greatly appreciate this aspect of Wallis. My push for Jim Wallis? Too often however his message can be taken as a call to get involved in National politics. For Wallis to be credible, I think he must address more directly how social action gets subsumed by the discourses of power (Foucault) and therefore will inevitably fail (in already has a record of failure) apart from a subversive body living this justice (the church).
Shane Claiborne was probably my personal favorite keynote. He described the process of living justice communally in the streets of North Philly. He described the simple ways they would address and engage poverty I thought this was amazing. My push for Shane? I think most suburban folk take a look at him or read his book and just say, “that could never be me.” But quite the contrary! I think the ethos (that way of living seeing, understanding and embodying) of justice that Shane models could take shape in the suburban churches. But I fear the radical nature of his appearance might just say to a lot of people that could never be me. I don’t believe it.
For more good stuff, see Darryl Dash’s live blog. Thanks Darryl for all your great work.
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.