I can identify, in some small way, with how Hosanna Wong must feel as controversy swirls around her spoken word invitation at a Southern Baptist Convention event. I suppose any woman who has spent more than a week in vocational ministry can.
I was recently disinvited to a speaking opportunity when those in charge read my bio and realized I was an ordained pastor. A woman with no theological training would have been welcomed, but someone with the credentials to say something about God’s Word was apparently unacceptable. Thankfully, that group is not representative of my Wesleyan Holiness theological tradition that has always ordained women. In fact, Hosanna Wong shared a spoken word at our denomination’s most recent General Conference, and it was a powerful moment and a smashing hit.
Not that we have it all figured out, either. Ordaining women, for much of our history, has simply meant that we have allowed women to serve in the places men didn’t want to. Women have planted churches in the worst neighborhoods and pioneered ministries and movements.Ordaining women, for much of our history, has simply meant that we have allowed women to serve in the places men didn’t want to. Click To Tweet
Today, in most denominations, there are a handful of incredibly gifted women in positions of tremendous leadership, and it may be tempting to think that the conversation around women in ministry is done. And while most denominations have more women in leadership and in vocational ministry than ever before, there is still a leadership chasm between men and women and few pipelines for gifted women to serve in positions of spiritual authority.While there are more women in leadership and vocational ministry than ever before, there is still a leadership chasm between men and women and few pipelines for gifted women to serve in positions of spiritual authority. Click To Tweet
I’ll just use my denomination as an example. In the last twenty years, we have seen a thirty percent increase in the number of women seeking ordination. And many of our appointed pastors are women. This is something to celebrate. But less than ten percent of those women serve in positions of spiritual authority (senior pastor, lead pastor). And of those that do, none serve in churches larger than 500 people. Titles and numbers are not how we measure effective Kingdom work, but it is an indicator of authority in today’s church constructs.
As a woman who has co-labored with men for twenty years of ministry and whose ministry has been most consistently championed by men, my solution is probably a bit of a letdown.
Can we please keep talking about this?
The Questions to Ask
Can we continue a conversation not motivated by fear, but motivated by an urgency to see all hands on deck? Can we pick up an honest dialogue, not with equality as its end goal, but with a common vision of Kingdom effectiveness?
To the men who want to empower the women beside, above, and behind them, ask: “How has ministry been different or difficult for you because of your gender?” And when we respond honestly, say, “I hear you.”
When a woman (hopefully gently and lovingly) asks you to consider your innate privilege and handle that privilege with care, say, “I am willing to try.”
Even though you consider yourself a champion of women in ministry, still be curious and ask yourself, “Where are my blind spots? What do I still have to learn about co-laboring well for the good of the church?”
When a woman does not accept an offer to lead and says she can’t, try to understand that it’s not because she’s not passionate or willing or able. Instead say, “Perhaps it’s because the structural pipelines that produce passion, willingness, confidence, and capacity have not been there for you. Let’s create a new pipeline.”
Offer the following encouragement: “You have a unique perspective because of and apart from your gender that is valuable. Have a seat.”
Or when #MeToo or #ChurchToo comes up: “I know I’m not personally responsible for her abuse. But I know we all share responsibility for the systemic sin that has allowed for abuse to prevail and often go unchecked.”
What if you were courageous and said, “I recognize that I have some control and some power to lose here, and that makes me nervous.” That would be such a healthy starting place.
When worried about backlash, you could say, “I care more about Kingdom living than I do about cultural sensitivity.”
On a practical level, here is a welcoming posture I love to see men extend to women: “We’re all going to grab lunch. Want to come too?”
Finally, I wish we would all say, “Let’s keep talking about this even when we’re tired of the conversation. Even when it’s not the center of the news cycle, and there are no hashtags to force it forward. Let’s stay committed to this issue until we look more and more like the reconciled community we were created to be.”
If you are woman in ministry who would like to connect with other women around these issues, please consider joining the E2020 conference next month, hosted by the Wesleyan Holiness Women Clergy.
Andrea Summers is an assistant professor of religion at Southern Wesleyan University. She holds a B.S. in psychology from Indiana Wesleyan University, an M.Div. from Asbury Theological Seminary, and will graduate with her doctorate from Emory’s Candler School of Theology in May.
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.