The issues facing our current models and systems of theological education are daunting. Not only are we are seeing more and more examples of seminaries facing extreme financial crises, but the common remedy to this issue of passing the costs on to students has resulted in massive amounts of student debt – a burden that may in fact be “killing the Church.” Another approach is to hire more and more adjunct instructors, but this may only be causing other problems.
Financial stability, however, may not be the most central issue. For many, the “real crisis” facing our seminaries and other centers of theological education has to do with underlying theological frameworks and assumptions that have served to contort our vision and practice of training theological leaders. Note, for example, the extensive, “Future of Seminary Education” symposium by various bloggers at Patheos; Fuller’s, “Seminary of the Future” project; or 3DM’s “The Future of Theological Education” white paper and video presentation. In addition, the ongoing “Cultural Liturgies” project (Desiring the Kingdom and Imagining the Kingdom) of James K.A. Smith, points in this same direction.
It is important to realize that how we read, evaluate, and respond to the issues of our day related to theological education will have significant implications for the shaping of future leaders and the Church at large.
In the workshop below, John Franke (Executive Director of the Yellowstone Theological Institute) and JR Rozko (Director of Operations & Advancement for Missio Alliance) explore these and other issues in conversation with other leaders in the world of theological education.
Let’s hear from you…
- Do you see a crisis in the world of theological education? What is its nature and what are your suggestions for addressing it?
- As a church leader, what are your thoughts on seminary education as you think about identifying future leaders and seeing them equipped for ministry?
Workshop Description:
The unraveling of Christendom in North America has given rise to a renewed interest in the calling and identity of the Church. However, far less attention has been paid to implications for theological education. Taking God’s missional nature as a point of departure, this workshop will explore the theological and sociological contours of of theological training in a new day, and look at the frontier of new educational initiatives. The way forward will be missional in orientation, exhibit a vital connection to the local church, mindful of a variety of ways to be engaged in ministry, and less focused on producing professionals.
The audio download of this workshop is available HERE and is available for free all day today, 9/23/13 (discount automatically applied when you add the workshop to your cart).
**If you find resources like this helpful, there are many more available here. You might even want to grab a bundle all at the same time.**
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.