The Nicene Creed: Historical Signpost of Christian Unity

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

No other religion has so high an ideal of an inclusive community of love. Yet, as we are to see again and again…no other religion has had as many divisions and as many bitter controversies between its adherents. This contrast between dream and actuality was probably inevitable.” – Kenneth Scott Latourette, A History of Christianity

Church fights are nothing new. I have lived through them as a pastor. I have felt the tension, pressure, stress, and pain of Christians who cannot get along. If you have not suffered through a church fight, then I would presume you have at least have first-hand knowledge of one. We are called to love one another. No one would disagree with this fact. Jesus looked at his disciples, a diverse group of men including a former Jewish-sell-out and a former armed-Jewish-zealot, and commanded them to love each other to demonstrate to the world what it looks like to be his disciple. He even prayed for his followers, his church, to be one, even as he is one with his Father (John 17:11). This prayer for unity had barely left the lips of Jesus before his fledgling flock of disciples scattered after his arrest. Ideally we are to love one another deeply and authentically, in spite of our differences. In reality, we are often a fractured bunch allowing our discontinuities to drive a wedge into our unity. It has been so since the beginning.

The Apostolic church spread through the Mediterranean world meeting primarily in homes, gathering around the celebration of the resurrection of Jesus. The Gospels and letters from the Apostles were being circulated, but “belief in the Bible” was not what bound them together. It was a common faith and worship of Jesus held together by a common creed that emerged as a source of unity. Churches had their creeds, different versions of what we know as the Apostles’ Creed, but they did not have one unifying creed. Their unity faced opposition in the beginning as church leaders worked to break free from being viewed as a Jewish sect (the Judiazers). They stood firm against the secret knowledge of the Greek-minded dualists who denied the goodness of creation (Gnostics). In keeping with the teachings of the Apostles, they rejected the view that the God of Old Testament was an evil, lesser God than the God and Father of Jesus (Marcionites). They preserved the church from a hyper-mystical obsession with the imminent return of Christ (Montanists). They established the orthodox belief in one God distinctly revealed as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit against those who saw the persons of the Trinity as mere “modes” or expressions of God (Sabellianism). Each of these heretical groups created strife and division in the church.

The integrity of the unity of the church would face it biggest test in the third century. Christian voices from the city of Alexandria (i.e. Clement, Origen, Dionysius, and Athanasius) were consistently in harmony in their proclamation of the Trinitarian unity of God. The Father is God. The Son is God. The Spirit is God. The Father is not the Son. The Son is not the Spirit. The Spirit is not the Father. They were challenged from a voice from within with a new teaching reacting strongly to the false view of the Father, Son, and Spirit as modes of God. The voice was that of Arius, a preacher from Alexandria. His teaching was clear enough: “the Son has a beginning but that God is without beginning” (Latourette, 153). Arius was condemned by church leaders in Alexandria and exiled. The church’s teaching from the beginning was the Son is fully God. Athanasius, who became the most influential voice of orthodoxy against Arianism, argued God became man so man could become God. Man’s need for salvation did not come from the creation of a lesser god, but by God himself. If God in his full essence and being did not become man, salvation and union with God was not attainable. The supporters of Arius protested and the church was thrown into a terrible conflict. Arius found support chiefly from Eusebius, Bishop of Nicomedia, an adviser to the Emperor Constantine.

In light of the turmoil created by the Arian controversy in the Eastern portion of his empire, Constantine convened the first ecumenical council since the Council of Jerusalem recorded in Acts 15. Whether or not Constantine called for council for political or religious reasons may be a matter of conjecture, such is the case when the church reaches for Caesar’s sword. Nevertheless, 300 bishops from both the Western and Eastern parts of the church gathered in Nicaea in 325 AD to consider, among other things, how to move forward as a unified church in light of the now well-heated Arian controversy. Lay people from numerous churches also attended the council adding pressure to the already tense gathering. Those representing the Arian position presented their doctrine to a mixed reaction. The historian Eusebius of Caesarea offered a solution by calling on the council to adopt the creed used in Caesarea, a form of the Apostles’ Creed. His suggestion became the basis for what we now know as the Nicene Creed. The key Greek word added to the Nicene Creed to speak of Jesus was homoousius, meaning “one substance and essence.” According to the creed, Jesus was “very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father.”

The decree of the council entirely failed to terminate the strife. Arianism continued to spread. After the death of Constantine in 337 AD Arianism was predominant in the Eastern churches. The council itself did not bring instant unity to the church, but the enduring value of the creed they adopted gave the church the symbol by which they found common ground as brothers and sisters in Christ. Arianism ultimately lost steam and the orthodox faith, captured in the Nicene Creed, emerged as the authentic faith of the Christian Church. The creed, born of controversy and division, became the “rule of faith” or “symbol of faith,” by which all Christians could join together in unity. It was further developed at the second ecumenical council in 381 AD and has carried on even in these modern times as a single connecting point where all Christians: Roman Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestants can join hands in Christian unity. Today we can find much to divide us in the body of Christ, my hope is we can find unity in our common belief in a common creed.

The creed has endured through previous conflicts, if we continue to allow it to form our faith, we can cling to the hope of real sincere unity in Christ.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tip the Author & Support Our Ministry!

Thank you for supporting this author and Missio Alliance’s ministry of online publishing! All our authors graciously volunteer their time and expertise in creating resourceful articles such as this. Your generosity makes it possible for their voices and perspectives to reach and influence Christian leaders all around the world.
From #GivingTuesday (Nov. 27) through the end of the year, half of any donation you make will go directly to this author while the other half will support Missio Alliance and our Writing Collective platform in particular. 
Donations in any amount are greatly appreciated! 
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Select Payment Method
Personal Info

Credit Card Info
This is a secure SSL encrypted payment.

Billing Details

Donation Total: $5

By commenting below, you agree to abide by the Missio Alliance Comment Policy.

16 responses to “WTWNC: From Bridge to Onramp – On a Proposed Way to Teach People Missional Evangelism

  1. This excites and encourages me David. When we meet in January I will show you some liturgies I have been working on where the express point is using the worship as a means of spiritual formation in these very areas. This piece will help sharpen the focus. Thanks!

  2. David,I like the emphasis of this overall. I love the on-ramp image, because when thought of in a communal sense, I envision each member of the community fitting in as a section of one HUGE on-ramp that is broad and welcoming (though, perhaps, the highway itself is narrow?). Anyway, I think that image could be taken to some good places if not pushed too far.

    The second preamble is indispensable in our current climate. People must see how this story is lived, not just theorized.

    After that…five things to do followed by five places to start is a little confusing. If I were in a class that used this as an outline, I would wonder, “Are these the same kinds of things? Are they supposed to correlate in some way?”

    Perhaps the “places to start” could be incorporated within various “things an on-ramp should be able to do”.

    If I were teaching this approach to evangelism (and maybe I will!) I’d offer the 2 preambles, and then 5 ways to be an on-ramp in God’s gospelizing mission. Each way would have a, “What’s my first step?” component.

  3. David,
    Really great work. I echo others’ comments. Preamble two is the key, especially for the “places to start.” The gospel has to be about those things; it has to be about ALL God is doing/wants to do in and through Christ, the real Lord. There may be a bit of resistance in evangelical circles to talking about “all Jesus began to do and teach” as gospel and as places to start, but I think it is dead on, and appropriate to the gospel accounts as well as the emphasis of Paul.

    This stuff reminds me of a question by Dallas Willard: “Does the gospel you preach naturally lead those who receive it to become apprentices of Jesus?” I don’t think I’ve ever seen an understanding of or approach to the gospel more inclined to do that. I look forward to thinking more about the post.

  4. I like the “onramp” metaphor, and the ideas here are generative.
    To the section on listening, I would add something about the importance of learning from the non-Christian neighbor. Leron Shults has put the concern as follows: “[C]hurches can too easily identify their mission as a colonizing of the other. And exclusive focus on the idea that “we” are sent to “them” can reinforce missiologies of aggression and invasion.”

  5. David,I just found your blog through my contact with Nazarene Theo. Sem.
    I can not comment now, but having spent 20 years in Central & South America as a Field Director I was assigned to Spain and have lived there i year. Your blog WTWNC is ringing true to my experience and I have been coming up with similar “preambles and To Do guidelines”.
    I am heading to Canada for a week, then Florida for a week, then Illinois for a week, and finally AZ for two weeks before I return to Spain Oct. 12th. I hope to interact with you more in the near future.

    Live “THE LIFE”,

    Mark T. Ryan

  6. I’ve been on this wavelength for years, and one of the foremost questions in my my mind is the extent to which we are “on ramps” not only leading people to Christ, but to the Body of Christ, where they will see His fullness manifest. Hearing about Jesus in abstraction, or experiencing His grace through individuals or families will not hold a candle, I believe, to experiencing His grace in the community of believers united to Christ and one another by the Spirit. My experience bears this out, as home groups can be a powerful context in which non-believers can taste and see the life of Christ. I’m inclined to side with George Hunter’s philosophy of “belong, then believe” (albeit not in a strictly ecclesiastical sense). It also is obviously very messy and vulnerable, when it comes to trying to balance both grace and truth.

  7. Thank’s Dave, “spirit and life” ways and means for God’s people always but especially pertinent for us today. I shared the “places to start” section with a brother in Romania this week. He said he is going to preach these to his congregation next Sunday!

  8. […] that we seek to do evangelism in the rhythms of everyday life, not through attractional means, that we become onramps for the gospel as opposed to transaction salesman, that we look for ways to inhabit our neighborhoods as Christ, […]

  9. […] notion of “getting people in motion” is huge and of course takes mentoring. Way back here (at the end of the post) I suggested 5 starting points for getting people into motion into the […]

  10. Law of Attraction and Manifestation Works…
    How do people know when their lives lack abundance? The most common‘ give away’ is that they are deeply unhappy with some phase or other of their situation. It is often the case that people think of material possessions when they consider abundance. Bu…

  11. […] about evangelism, the gospel and witness. You can start by looking at these posts here, here and here. There’s more elsewhere on the blog. For now, I am interested in your reflections on these […]

  12. […] in my own practical teaching ever since. a.) Instilling Missional Habits in a Congregation, b.) From Bridge to Onramp -Teaching Missional Evangelism, and c.) an example of exegeting your local community (in this case the suburbs) […]

  13. […] You can read the whole article here at the Reclaiming the Mission blog. Tags:  blogaday2011, David Fitch, Forge Canada This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 15th, 2011 at 8:03 pm and is filed under Incarnational, Missional. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *