In an interview recorded by Bill and Imbi Kinnon, Gary Nelson (president of Tyndale University College Toronto) and I discuss some of the psycho social hurdles that pastors must get past to lead missionally. When I say lead missionally, I am assuming a distinction between leading a church that is internally focused versus a church that is externally focused. The former’s focus is on already existing Christians. The latter’s focus is on those yet to come into full relationship with God in Christ. Of course we must as church leaders nurture the community’s life in Christ. This should lead into (and be part and parcel of) engaging what God is doing in the surrounding places we inhabit in everyday life. I strongly argue that the external is not possible without the internal. Nonetheless, within the confines of Christendom (Christian culture), there is always the dynamic that can take over a church which sucks its entire focus into nurturing Christians. This is where immediate success is visible, accolades abound, and the temptation to brand and compete plays on some of our most common (American) impulses. The pastor must struggle against these dynamics to lead missionally, to lead the church into the neighborhoods. There are psycho social hurdles here that play on the pastor’s own sense of self, identity and security.
To summarize here’s the three psycho-social hurdles:
a.) It’s hard to give up the safety of the top down finely tuned organization that has a steady stream of Christians (customers) who are habitualized into coming to church to receive certain goods and services. This works. It is safe. The task is to keep every body happy and satisfied. There is a subtle inertia here that keeps the pastor from asking questions, upsetting the applecart, leading the church into risky ventures which demand a different kind of commitment and imagination. This inhibits the congregation from developing an imagination beyond the four walls of the church.
b.) It’s hard to give up the sense of self-identity we get as pastor of a successful church. We are ever tempted to do things to increase numbers and (to put it prejoratively) acquire the customer loyalty of more already existing Christians The pastor must overcome the subtle inertia there that keeps our attention focused on things that will be visibly more successful and enhance our personal identity in the process. This inhibits the congregation from being pushed out into the neighborhhoods doing things which do not produce the immediate numbers!
c.) It’s hard to give up the authority that comes in the top down organizations. There is a subtle inertia here that tempts us pastors to live in this authority because it gets things done quickly and gives us a sense of accomplishment and power. Yet this dynamic passivizes the congregation into a disposition where they always look to the pastor for the “ok.” This inhibits the congregation from dispersing in to the neighborhoods with multiple leaders carrying authority into the various contexts of mission.
If you are a pastor, have you experienced these psycho-social hurdles? How? If are a Christian, how have you noticed these social dynamics at play in your church gathering? What other psycho-social hurdles have you experienced, seen at work in local churches?
Pastors in Post-Christendom from Bill Kinnon on Vimeo.
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.