Every Sunday, we’ll be posting articles and links that are saying something important about church, culture, and mission. Here’s what resonated with us this week on the web:
Church & Theology
Pastor Corey Widmer explores a deeper theology of sin on the Third Church blog:
As the funerals of those killed in Charleston come to a close and as the Christian community reflects on race and our role in it, I’d like to go deeper into a Biblical theology of sin and how it might inform our response to a situation like the one in Charleston. Many pundits and other media leaders are suggesting we should respond this way and that; but how does the Bible call us to respond? And how might a richer, deeper biblical theology of sin help us to be faithful to the gospel even in difficult national conversations about history and race?
Gannon Sims writes at Fresh Expressions US about making disciples in fresh expressions of church:
The way we understand discipleship gets to the heart of what it means to be Church. Bob Hopkins, of the UK Fresh Expressions team suggests “If church becomes more of a verb, then we can see church done in its different aspects in different activities, engagements, families and get-togethers. . . contributing to one another to make it fully church.”
Ben Sternke lists seven kinds of books every pastor should read:
I named this post “7 Kinds of Books Every Pastor Should Read” because it seemed like a good headline, but I don’t actually want to be that prescriptive about it. But as I thought about the kinds of books I’m reading, they seem to boil down into these 7 categories. I’ve also put a couple examples of each category.
News & Views
Wesley Hill writes at The Washington Post about a gay Christian leader's recent resignation, and showing honor:
Julie and I both know that Christian churches and communities are often toxic places for LGBT people. Drawing only from my own small circle of gay friends, I could share stories of jobs denied, friendships lost, promotions refused and hospitality qualified — all because of what Julie describes, rightly, as “straight up homophobia.”
And yet I’m not sure that such tragedies are the result of the traditional Christian teaching on marriage and sex in and of itself.
Ed Stetzer writes at Christianity Today with a challenge to progressive Christians on Planned Parenthood and abortion:
Will this video actually cause some mainline Christians and progressive evangelicals to think that, perhaps, the overwhelming embrace of abortion, or "choice," has led to this—an all out defense of an abortion doctor casually dismissing the crushing of human bodies in the womb in specific ways so that profitable organs can be preserved?
Benjamin Corey writes about Bree Newsome and her act of civil disobedience in taking down the Confederate flag:
Of all the things I think we can learn from Bree Newsome, perhaps the most important is the realization that peace refers to entire situations and communities being made right. Thusly, if one is dedicated to nonviolent peacemaking in the tradition of following Jesus, one is dedicated not to calm, but to making things right again.
Favorite Podcasts
Dan White Jr. on the Sermonsmith podcast.
Rob Bell on the Seminary Dropout podcast.
Stan Graham on the Fresh Expressions US podcast.
On The Missio Blog
Thinking About Transitioning A Church? Don’t Do It!, by Seth Richardson and Matt Tebbe.
A Baptism Of Tears, by Dr. Charlie Self.
ANNOUNCING: A New Podcast Partnership With Theology On Mission + The Latest Episode!, by Missio Alliance.
A Or B? A Few Thoughts On Discernment And Decision Making, by Scott Emery.
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.