To borrow a phrase from the early 90’s TV talk show host Arsenio Hall, there are things over the blogland recently that are curious, odd or just plain absurd if we just took the time to think about them. They make me go hmmmmmmmm.
Like:
1.) Chicago is the least churched city in USA? I can’t believe this. But if this is true, how can hundreds of conversions be happening in this megachurch in Chicagoland, along with all the other happenings in Chicagoland, home of some of the most respected megachurches in N America, and Chicago still become the least churched city in U.S.? Either we’re playing musical chairs or this just ain’t true. It makes me go Hmmmmmmmmm.
2.) Blogging Book Reviews Losing Street-Cred? Recently Bro Maynard “was discussing blogged book reviews with someone who suggested that there seems to be a dearth of books about which everyone can blog excitedly and/or favorably – at least for those of us in the emerging/missional conversation, and it was wondered whether all the blogging about books we aren’t passionate about was negatively influencing the conversation.” I know I’ve been asked to review alot of books lately on this blog. I’m honored. But I am also swamped. And I have to wonder whether blogging is being absorbed by the marketing machines of corporate publishing. I have to wonder whether people are even reading the blogger’s book reviews now that they are sensing that this is corporate marketing? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
3.) What’s New about Calvinism? Time Magazine called the New Calvinism the third biggest idea changing the world right now. I just don’t see how there’s anything new here (NOT THAT THAT”S A BAD THING) And I find it odd that (Southern) Baptists became Calvinists, and the attack on the NEW Perspective on Paul (and NT Wright) is somehow called new. I admit I have an axe to grind here. It still makes me shake my head (and go hmmmmmmmm).
4.) Insulting Brian McLaren has never been easy. He’s too charming. But when I read this recently I decided to confess my sin and recommit myself to never talking (or writing) about any one PERSONALLY no matter how badly I disagree with him/her. I recommit to addressing only someone’s writings or their public comments (which are game for conversation and discernment), and to never take a deliberate shot at someone for insult value. Because in statements like this, what’s being accomplished (for Christ)? Again makes me go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. (Thanks to my friend up north for the link)
5.) What Evangelicals Can Teach Rush Limbaugh. When Rush Limbaugh said “he hopes Obama fails” and challenged him to come on his radio show and debate I shook my head. I thought about a lesson I’ve learned from the pastoral ministry. Never go into an argument for the sake of winning it. Go for the purpose of discerning the Kingdom together. If the mentality is “to win” only guerilla logic results. Especially if you are on the other guys turf which as Christians we most often should be. Unfortunately evangelical churches have little to teach Limbaugh on this score. We often argue in the same pathetic way (even worse since we try to be loving and “Biblical”) that Limbaugh does and it brings down the church everytime. Who models the mode of Christain discernment more: Limbaugh and his Christain followers, or Obama and his? Makes me sick to my stomach and go hmmmmmmmm.
6.) Kudos to Michael Spencer on an issue I believe will only become more relevant (I have a book forthcoming 2010 The End of Evangelicalism? Discerning a New Faithfulness). Thanks IM.
Just some thoughts that make me go hmmmmmmmm .
I’m off to Toronto the the Evolving Church Conference to participate and enjoy. Please stop by and say hello if you’re around.
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.