Those of us living in the UK or North America have been overtaken by a series of events that have accelerated feelings of fear, crisis and anxiety among citizens. Less people are confident in government and economic entities, unsure of whether they can ensure a stable future.
Elites and thought leaders have largely failed to foresee or account for recent events. Indeed, their responses feel like the shock of the entitled that can’t believe the “rabble” would behave the way they are in terms of democratic decisions.
Looking at recent events
Recent events are revealing a churning just below the surface of everyday life among Western peoples. Something is going on, off the public stage and beyond the access of leaders and media gurus.
As Christians on both sides of the Atlantic, we’re now live in communities increasingly shaped by mistrust, anger, confusion, anxiety and fear. Neighbors feel increasingly at risk in communities that, until recently, were the bedrock of security.
Recent events are revealing a churning just below the surface of everyday life. Click To TweetWe find ourselves implicated in a massive unraveling in which the established structures of state, economics and their educated elites have lost their capacity to lead. For some, it’s the election of Donald Trump, with its attendant shock to all elites who feel blindsided, shocked that the outcome of the vote was different than what they expected from the people.
For others, it’s the hugely off-balancing Brexit vote, or the radical divisions that have re-emerged on the streets of America with movements such as Black Lives Matter, or the fear of the other in the form of migrants and refugees, or the growing chasm between the 1% and the rest that was such a central concern of the Occupy movements, or the eviscerating of a middle class that has been the basis for the social and political cohesion of Western democracies and so on and so on.
Mistrust of elites and institutions across the West is palpable.
Christianity during these confusing times
In the Journal of Missional Practice (JMP), we’ve been raising questions about how the Christian narrative, an increasingly minority perspective across Western countries, can contribute to and cultivate spaces for the common good across increasingly pluralistic communities fraught with economic, social, racial and political divides.
Issue 7 of the JMP engaged the question of how we participate in forming mediating spaces across these complex tensions. We have sought to discern how the gospel can be earthed in the local by listening in on stories of how small gatherings of Christians are working for the common good in their communities.
The JMP wants to go beyond a concern for these tensions. More critically, it wants to address the question of what is happening underneath all of this in terms of the question of a missional engagement in this Western culture. As an editorial board, we know we can’t step into these issues with premature analysis or quick determinations about the nature of a gospel engagement.
How do we discern helpful ways of attending to this unraveling? We are aware of the temptation that invites us to take these movements of reaction, tension and anxiety and analyze them within the social, theological and cultural frameworks in which we’ve been formed in order to frame comprehensive explanations for what is happening.
What we don’t want to do is apply our own internalized models to explain what is happening (for example: “Brexit” or the Trump election is just part of such and such a social movement that can be explained by these models of social change or this theory of how people react when they feel under duress) because at the end of this road we are taking hugely important movements and fitting them inside our own current understanding of the world.
In so doing we perpetuate a kind of colonization that has characterized too much of dominant Western responses to cultural change. We are good at this analysis but we’re sure it won’t help us hear the Spirit. We wonder – what if the disruptions of political, social and economic unraveling can’t be fitted into the current scheme of things? What if applying our own rationalized forms of explanation misdirects us from hearing the Spirit?
What if applying our own rationalized forms of explanation misdirects us from hearing the Spirit? Click To TweetThe Journal is trying to test out these instincts. It is doing this by starting from the grounded stories of Christians in specific locales who are attempting to grapple with some of the issues named above. How do we engage these stories with Biblical-theological conversations that resist the colonizing defaults within us to press everything into existing categories of social change? How might we become open to hearing the Spirit in new ways? How might these stories invite us to listen differently in order to be questioned by them?
The current issue is framed around a number of grounded interviews with Christian communities/leaders engaged with some of these questions in their communities. We will share these stories with you but NOT try to provide in-depth analysis. We won’t pretend we have some authoritative place from which to speak. We will record ways specific communities of God’s people are seeking to engage the common good in the light of these issues and then invite engagement on how we might be hearing the Spirit.
We will record ways specific communities of God’s people are seeking the common good. Click To Tweet
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.