At theology pub Friday, we all sat around and conversed on the issues of worship. I put forward the typology of “lecture hall” worship versus “rock concert pep-rally” worship as the primary modes of worship for evangelicals and suggested that both were inadequate for forming truthful minds and faith experience in Christians. This typology is found in chapter four in my the Great Giveaway. The people at our pub ranged in age from 16 to early 50’s. Most seemed to agree that a worship service geared entirely towards a 55 minute sermon which seeks to dispense information information to Cartesian minds, is inadequate for formative worship. What was less obvious and hotly debated, was the legitimacy of rock concert style worship to form us into Christ.
I continue to assert that a sufficient theology of worship must come to grips with the epistemological shifts of the last century whereby we can no longer be naive that “religious experience” is an apriori given that affords immediate access to God. Rather experience is produced through interpretive frameworks, particularly linguistic. Experience is something learned and trained into. As Lindbeck would say, “there is no uninterpreted experience.” After Wittgenstein, Lindbeck, Hauerwas and others therefore, we cannot avoid paying attention to liturgy, including language, symbol and sacrament all governed within the church’s Scriptures given to us in Christ.
This is one of the reasons why the evangelical church must move beyond the “lecture hall” and the “rock concert pep rally” if we wish to recover a worship that shapes truthful minds and faithful experience.
In light of this I hope to say some words in posts to come about Carl Raschke’s The Next Reformation: Why Evangelicals Must Embrace PostModernity. Here Raschke argues that charistmatic worship and church experience is the way forward for evangelicals in postmodernity. I am all for a charismatic experience, a worship of God that includes emotions and the gifts and miracles, as long as it is formed out of faithful linguistic structures, as a response to God and ordered to God. I there hope to publish a few posts in the days ahead suggesting some qualifiers to Raschke if we evangelicals, and especially the emergent church are to take his book seriously for the way forward in these postmodern times. Also forthcoming, some notes on Kevin Van Hoozer’s Book The Drama of Doctrine.
Missio Alliance Comment Policy
The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.
Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:
1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.
If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.
2. Seek to make your own voice heard.
We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.
3. Share your story.
One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.
In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.